by Andrew Puhanic
May 22, 2012
from
TheGlobalistReport Website
Deutsch version
Globalist Bilderberg Group
With the 2012
Bilderberg Group meeting fast approaching,
the globalist (below insert) backed
main stream media continues to ignore
reporting on the leading events of the next Bilderberg Group meeting.
Who are the Globalists and what is a
Globalist?
The Globalist agenda
is real and the Globalists themselves are the greatest threat to
human civilization. Every day, more and more people are affected
in some way, shape or form because of the Globalists and the
Globalist agenda.
In consideration of the entire Globalist plan, the Globalist
ideology and other Globalist propaganda, I think it’s time to
redefine what a Globalist is.
The most popular definition of what is a Globalist and who are
the Globalists so far is “the Globalist movement is an alliance
based on self-interests of the private international financiers
and the royal, dynastic and hereditary land owning families of
Britain, Europe and America which over the years have
intermarried to create a self regenerating power structure that
through lies and deception seeks to control everything and
everyone”.
Although this definition of who and what is s Globalist is true,
I think the definition doesn’t go far enough to explain why the
Globalists intend to bring forth the new world order, why the
Globalists exist and where the Globalists intend the global
community to be in 50, 100 and 200 years.
It’s also an appropriate time to evaluate the standard
definition of who are the Globalists as the Globalists have now
encroached in almost every country of the world. Up until 30
years ago, the Globalists only had an interest and presence in
western countries and a limited number of African and Asian
countries.
A New Definition of “Who Are
the Globalists”
After much
consideration and thought, I would like to propose to the
activist, free thinking, and anti-globalist movements that we
define the Globalists as:
The Globalists are a conglomerate of individuals, interest
groups and large corporations who actively seek to eliminate all
countries to create a global border-less society so that they
can centralize, reduce and standardize all economies, production
and the processing of natural resources so that they can
directly control, manipulate and influence the decisions we make
to ensure they maintain their power, control, wealth and
historical influence.
This new definition of who are the Globalists takes a broader
view of why they exist and why and for what purpose do they seek
to implement their Globalist agenda.
As this definition if who are the Globalists is new, I would
like to hear what your thoughts are and if you feel we can tweak
the definition in any way.
Source
The corporate whore main stream media (yes
that’s exactly who they are and I don’t apologies for using such harsh
language) has purposefully not made any mention of the upcoming Bilderberg
Group meeting and has in fact deliberately began a systematic attack on the
alternative media and Bilderberg truthers for their efforts to report on the
Bilderberg Group meeting and its agenda.
It’s unbelievable and difficult to comprehend why the main stream media has
been so blatant in its lack of coverage of the Bilderberg Group meetings.
Think about it, every year there is an event
where most of the top globalists, politicians, bankers and corporate
industrialists congregate to “actively” plan and strategize global
political, economic and environmental programs behind everyone’s back, in
secret and without any accountability, yet the main stream media thinks it’s
not worthy of reporting?
To demonstrate how little coverage there has been of the Bilderberg Group
meetings in the main stream media, a simple Google news search for
Bilderberg Group revealed only 652 results (most of which aren’t news items
about the Bilderberg Group, but rather keywords found from comments), Bing
News produced 23 results and Yahoo News delivered 13 results.
So let’s think about the reporting results of Google, Bing and Yahoo
logically.
The top globalists, politicians and business
leaders congregate to meet secretly to discuss political, economic and
environmental programs, of which the outcomes affect everyone, yet the top 3
search engines could only find 688 results globally?
In comparison to the 1,310,000 results for “one
direction” in Google News, I think it’s pretty obvious that there is in
effect a blackout of Bilderberg Group reporting.
To even further demonstrate
the Bilderberg blackout,
Reuters News only published 10 articles
about the Bilderberg Group, with the last one being in December 2011.
Considering the lack of Bilderberg Group reporting, when the main stream
media does decide to publish Bilderberg Group news, they usually make all
efforts to “rosy” the image of the Bilderberg Group and try to dismiss the
group as some sort of conspiracy theory.
The ‘Independent’
recently slammed the Bilderberg Group as some sort of shadowy (conspiracy
theory) group while reporting about a conference Google is hosting for its
globalist acquaintances.
They were quoted as saying,
“For conspiracy theorists, the conference,
staged by the search engine giant, is a cuddlier version of the
Bilderberg Group, the supposedly shadowy network of financiers that
holds a private annual assembly, recast in the image of our new tech
masters”
Fareed Zakaria
from CNN, another globalist and
Bilderberg backed institution, also publicized a story about the
Bilderberg Group describing them as,
“a conference like dozens of others around
the world”.
Zakaria then went on to say,
“the idea that a finance minister or a
banker would say something with a group of 150 people that is any
different than what he would say in public is crazy in today’s world
where everything leaks instantly”.
I think it’s fair to suggest that Zakaria’s
second statement is just ignorant.
-
Does Zakaria actually believe the Bilderbergers
sit there and talk about matters already discussed in the public domain?
-
If
this was the case, then why doesn’t the Bilderberg Group publicize its
meeting minutes?
-
Or even better, why don’t they invite the alternative media
to report on the events of the conference?
Also more recently, Kenneth Vogel from Politico
wrote an article highlighting the emerging
trends in the alternative media around reporting of the Bilderberg Group.
The essence of his article highlights the lack of urgency and willingness of
the main stream media to hold to account the dealings and agenda of the Bilderberg Group. Not once during Vogel’s article does he truly question the
motive of the Bilderberg Group.
Vogel’s article clearly demonstrates the lack of interest
the main stream media has for the
Bilderberg Group and its agenda.
I think it’s time, and I believe you would agree, that we all stop referring
to the Bilderberg Group as some sort of conspiracy theory, but rather as a
real institution who as a collective has a capacity to deliver programs and
change on a global scale.
The inherent capacity of the Bilderberg Group to make such decisions is
undesirable and is a threat to the stability and future of the world.
So where else does the 1% who control the 99% congregate in secrecy and why
does the main stream media avoid them like the plague? I think the latter
part of the question needs to be explored further and only the alternative
media has the guts to do so.
Until the hand that feeds the dog is eliminated, the main stream media will
never change.